Open Source Smartphones



With the proliferation of reliable open source software, the last truly untouched market in the US is being cracked. Smartphones remain almost exclusively propitiatory in the US. Since Smartphone use isĀ  growing into small business markets and private use, the ability to create and update an open source smartphone OS would be amazing. The down side however, shows that iPhone , Blackberry, and Android users would be left in the dark when the shift takes place. If AT&T or Verizon begin to shift, will Smartphone users be left behind. Or will both Google and Apple allow the hardware to be operate on none exclusive OS software without canceling user service agreements?

The thought is both liberating and really scary!

Symbian’s Move Toward Open Source Gathers Steam — symbian — InformationWeek

The momentum to turn Symbian into an open source mobile operating system is strong, and developers can expect to see a preliminary version in the first half of 2009, said Lee Williams, nominated executive director of the Symbian Foundation.

Symbian is the dominant mobile operating system, with nearly 50% of the global market. But it has faced increased competition from entrenched players like Research In Motion (NSDQ: RIMM), Microsoft (NSDQ: MSFT)’s Windows Mobile, and relatively new players like Apple and the Google (NSDQ: GOOG)-backed Android platform. In June, Nokia (NYSE: NOK) announced plans to purchase the remaining stock in Symbian and spin it into a royalty-free operating system under the Eclipse Public License. The goal was to harness the innovation of the open source environment to increase market share, as well as to attract application developers.
The Symbian Foundation was created to steward that transition, and it includes industry heavyweights such as AT&T (NYSE: T), Nokia, Samsung, Sony Ericsson, and T-Mobile. During a roundtable event at the Symbian Partner Event in San Francisco Thursday, executives from AT&T, Nokia, Symbian, and Visa discussed the progress and obstacles of moving to open source.

Williams said the foundation has hit or surpassed many of its internal milestones regarding operations and processes, and it will begin recruiting and hiring soon. Foundation members are still in the process of “code bashing” Symbian with Nokia’s S60, DoCoMo’s Mobile Oriented Applications Platform, and UIQ to create the new platform.

Symbian and S60 in particular have been optimized around the “scroll and select” input method. This makes devices like the Nokia E71 easy to use one-handed, but it has also led to a somewhat stagnant user interface, particularly in comparison to the iPhone 3G and even the Android-powered G1. Williams said the foundation has the opportunity to blend the functionality of the existing Symbian with advanced touch and sensor methods that could ultimately lead to a more usable and visually pleasing UI.

Applications and developers will be crucial to the success of the new Symbian, and a developer relations program is being set in place. One knock on Symbian has been that it’s a powerful operating system, but developing for it can be costly and difficult. Williams said the foundation wants to ensure that developers of all kinds will be able to create content with programs they are familiar with such as Flash. He also praised how Apple and Google have made creating applications for their mobile platforms easy, particularly for small companies, hobbyists, and content providers.

While popular across the globe, Symbian devices have not been able to capture a large market in North America. The United States is behind many other advanced countries in smartphone adoption rates and 3G networks, but it remains one of the largest potential markets. One major factor in the paltry U.S. adoption rate of Symbian phones is the relatively weak carrier support. That could change as AT&T appears to be taking a large role in the foundation.

Roger Smith, director of next generation services for AT&T, said the mobile operator is looking to standardize on as few mobile platforms as possible over the next few years in order to avoid fragmentation. With its rich history in the mobile space, Symbian is a “credible candidate” to be one of the few operating systems that AT&T backs, Smith said.

“If done well and done right, this can be a game-changing event,” Smith said of the open source Symbian.

Being involved with the mobile operating system potentially lets AT&T play a larger role in the ownership of the customer experience. For example, the iPhone 3G has been a big hit for AT&T, but users have virtually no contact with the carrier besides billing and customer service. Smith said a percentage of its customers may want the experience that the iPhone or BlackBerry provides, but there is a large chunk of its subscriber base that isn’t being addressed.

“We’re going to take more control over our destiny in the mobile operating space,” Smith said.

Education and Open Source

Education, Personal, Technology


OpenOffice 3 available now : Christopher Null : Yahoo! Tech

The End Of The World — LinuxWorld, That Is – Open Source Blog – InformationWeek

   For many people in the education/academic community open source has been a  wonderful add-on to the now mobile/digital classroom. Students come from diverse backgrounds which means that their technology is diverse too. Open Office and Linux have long been the benchmarks of productive and successful open source software. In recent years, the growth of Mozilla additional programs have added to the fold such programs as Firefox, Thunderbird (an MS Outlook replacement), and Bugzilla (a progrma debugger). So many people in the digital world continue to thrive and survive based on a patchwork of programs. To think about the progess made in the past decade is amazing, and to see how far we have come in the technology markets.
   The once dominate firms of Microsoft and Apple do not have to fear the Open Source market but the idea of incorporating and building new machines and software that can accommodate users is never ending. Harddrives divided show that multiple users can work in the OS of their choice. No longer do we have two choices of Internet Browsers but now more than a dozen different browsers share part of the global market space. I myself use Safari, Firefox, Chrome, and IE for various different websites and functions. In the end, the needs of the consumer can be seen as the driving force behind the market and that is a good thing.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]